From experience of people using AI because it 'knows' as much as an experienced human professional, it turns out not to know (no quotes) anything.
Professionals who reason from their sector knowledge and modelled experience are at no risk of losing work, if the employer wants verifiable, contextually informed, solutions.
It's the old engineer joke all over again. Invoice £10,000 for 30 minutes on site: £100 for the time on site fixing it; £9,900 for my experience in knowing how to get the job done in 30 minutes.
People from outside my sector (academic research) regularly challenge me with AI solutions. But they don't know enough to check the validity of the answer, so it's useless to them. Kids type numbers into calculators, come up with a ludricous answer and accept it as correct. AI cannot be useful without a skilled chaperone. So if you're already employing that person to check the AI, why bother with the AI?
I might keep AI as a pet, to help take notes, or to keep my diary, but it's never writing letters to my clients without my checking them too!