model_railway
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| model_railway [2023/05/01 16:30] – doc | model_railway [2026/03/08 16:35] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| But because it's so small, accessories such as electric point motors are very big, comparatively. | But because it's so small, accessories such as electric point motors are very big, comparatively. | ||
| - | So I thought I should try and make a very small motor driven point system that when placed on the layout, would not appear too monstrously large. Many people put their point switch motors underneath the layout board, just bringing | + | So I thought I should try and make a very small motor driven point system that when placed on the layout, would not appear too monstrously large. Many people put their point switch motors underneath the layout board and use a solenoid driver with a lever up through the board. Some motor systems use a tiny driven cable above the layout' |
| The stepper motors to be used are like this: | The stepper motors to be used are like this: | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| //picture of driver board// | //picture of driver board// | ||
| - | My predicted layout has three levels, a top level fiddle yard, figure of eight main track with reverse loop, a terminus | + | My predicted layout has three levels, a top level fiddle yard, figure of eight main track with reverse loop, a terminus |
| + | This is a very small layout, even for n-gauge, at 120x60cm. A standard board size in the UK, the metric version of 4' | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
model_railway.1682958654.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)